Review: Hey, Baby


Anonymous: Why am I shooting men in that game?
and why is it saying "R.I.P. very attractive"
o.O
and I can't shoot women or some specific men


Laylah: You're only supposed to shoot the ones you want to punish for what they say to you.

Anonymous: No, I want to shoot them all 

Laylah: Well, RIP (phrase here)  is the last thing he said to you, inscribed on his tombstone.
 
Anonymous: "Oh my god, I hope you like black men" who the hell says stuff like that?
and I shoot them all before they can say anything :P just reading it on the gravestone 

Laylah: Guys on the street, in that case specifically a man hassling a woman possibly not of his race.
 
Anonymous: Do people really feel offended when someone says "God bless you'"? 

Laylah: Damn. You're a manhater.
YOU HAVE THE OPTION NOT TO SHOOT.
 
Anonymous: Every woman has her urges!
ehr... 

Laylah: And you know some people are offended by anything.
 
Anonymous: There are no consequences, so why not? 

Laylah: Because even if I could kill everyone, I would not.
o.O 

Anonymous: And I want to shoot the women for walking around as if they were something better and ignoring me!
 
Laylah: Lesbian, or just bi? 

Anonymous: Doesn't matter, they act snobby! isn't that what women thing? :P
I'm trying to roleplay that women damnit!
^^ 
woman 

Laylah: "Think"?
Just keep going.

Anonymous: Okay, women don't think, you are right ^^
heh I'll stop that game now
city full of gravestones
and yes think

Laylah: Great. I'm taking this entire chat, redacting your nickname out of it, and posting it as my review of the game.

Anonymous: A game without consequences and feedback to anything, those are part of the basic core that a game needs to not fail

Laylah: This is a simple fantasy game. 

Anonymous: No, it's a projection of the female mind!

Laylah: I'm not sure it was even written by *a* woman, and I'm pretty sure it was not written by all women as I was not consulted.

(Note: Author has not actually visited the website and tried the game herself, but instead gave the link to two male gamer friends who like to try anything, because she thought it sounded funny. Did not read background material if available. This is still nevertheless a better review of a game than most found on, for instance, MMORPG.com )
Enhanced by Zemanta

The A in A-List is for Attention (Where's the W for Whore?)

There are many reasons why we should stay true to who we are. But importantly, I can’t think of any reason not to.

Some may not like what they see when you show them everything. They may walk away and never come back. That’s ok. Let them. From their shadows many more will walk into the light. Those are the people you want around anyways.
-- from Write to Done's Flipside to Authenticity: What you stand to gain from sharing your dirty laundry.

That's from something about how, if you're going to blog on any subject, you should basically tell your audience everything about you including (apparently) your bedroom habits.

Do you immediately see, as I do, the flaw in the above advice?

I DO NOT FUCKING WANT EVERYONE ON THE INTERNET 'AROUND ME'. I JUST WANT WRITE SOME STUFF DOWN.

I have been to 4chan. I have seen the masked but ugly legion of faces that are Anonymous. I do not want them in my bedroom.

The thing to do with dirty laundry is to wash it yourself, and only a *man* could think otherwise.

Zuckerberg's Privacy Stance: Facebook CEO 'Doesn't Believe In Privacy'


^This, except that I don't want to actually *look* at his 'little head'; I'll be happy if the right guys do that, instead.



When privacy becomes weird, only the weird will have privacy.



When privacy becomes a commodity, only people who pay for what they needn't pay for -or- those who know how not to pay for anything, will have it.



"People have really gotten comfortable with the choice to not only share more information and different kinds, but more openly and with more people-- or not". Fixed. Not to bash on curly-headed gingers, but is this a case of Revenge Thinking at work? Why is he, essentially, ridiculing-as-unpopular-and-abnormal something that's very, very basic?
About Facebook
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost

Got My Mojo Workin'

I Got My Mojo Working

Muddy Waters

Got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you
Got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you
I wanna love you so bad till I don't know what to do


I'm going down to Louisiana to get me a mojo hand

I'm going down to Louisiana to get me a mojo hand
I'm gonna have all you women right here at my command


Got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you
Got my mojo working, but it just won't work on you
I wanna love you so bad till I don't know what to do


I got a gypsy woman givin' me advice
I got a gypsy woman givin' me advice
I got some red hot tips I got to keep on ice


Got my mojo working
Got my mojo working
Got my mojo working

.....

But it - uh uh - just won't work on you

Rubric for the Day [RotD]

HAVANA  - FEBRUARY 20:  The moon is seen almost fully eclipsed as it passes through the Earth's shadow
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
Fragment on Dissembling
By Lucie Brock Broido

Curious in your dark
Frock-coat, do everything
That you have to,
If it is time;
Leave nothing
Still unsaid.
Once, to make of nothing
Something, was divine.
To have made
Of something
Nothing, was sublime.

Excerpt from TROUBLE IN MIND. Copyright © 2004 by Lucie Brock Broido.

Porphyria's Lover

...[A] dramatic monologue about taking refuge from a storm with the person you love most. Nestled in a cottage in the woods, the narrator and his beautiful Porphyria cozy up by the fire and gaze longingly at each other.

Realizing that Porphyria loves him, the narrator decides to preserve the Kodak moment by strangling her with her own hair. He then kisses, props up, and sits beside her dead body, admiring its loveliness through the rest of the night. So much for everything you thought you knew about Victorian love poetry.

Porphyria’s Lover”, by Robert Browning


In A Nutshell

"Porphyria's Lover" is one of the earliest of Robert Browning's dramatic monologues. It was originally published in 1836 in a magazine called the Monthly Repository under the title "Porphyria," and then republished in 1842 in a book called Dramatic Lyrics alongside another of Browning's poems, "Johannes Agricola in Meditation." The 1842 publication titled the two poems, collectively, "Madhouse Cells." It wasn't until 1863 that the poem was given the title that we now use, "Porphyria's Lover."

The 1842 title "Madhouse Cells" underlines the abnormal psychology of the speakers of Browning's poems. Actually, to say "abnormal psychology" is putting it pretty mildly: the speaker of "Porphyria's Lover" murders his girlfriend by strangling her with her hair, and then sits and admires the corpse for the rest of the night. So "psychotic" might be a better way of describing the speaker of "Porphyria's Lover."

Now might be a good time to point out that the speaker of "Porphyria's Lover," like the speakers of any of Browning's monologues, is a dramatic character – it's not Robert Browning himself! The poem is entirely from the point of view of a psychotic killer, which puts the reader in the uncomfortable position of reading the thoughts – or, if you're reading the poem out loud, of giving voice to the thoughts – of a madman. This is just one reason that Browning's monologues have received so much critical attention in recent decades.

Unfortunately for Robert Browning, though, most of his poetry was ignored during his life – his wife, Elizabeth Barrett Browning, was much more successful commercially. Ever heard of the sonnet "How do I love thee? Let me count the ways…"? That's Elizabeth Barrett Browning, writing about her love for her husband, Robert. During the Victorian period (i.e., during the reign of Queen Victoria in Great Britain, or 1837-1901), readers preferred poems like Barrett Browning's – poems about love and beauty – rather than poems like Robert Browning's, which probe the psychological depths of criminals and murderers.

Text of the Poem

The rain set early in tonight,
The sullen wind was soon awake,
It tore the elm-tops down for spite,
And did its worst to vex the lake:
I listened with heart fit to break.
When glided in Porphyria; straight
She shut the cold out and the storm,
And kneeled and made the cheerless grate
Blaze up, and all the cottage warm;
Which done, she rose, and from her form
Withdrew the dripping cloak and shawl,
And laid her soiled gloves by, untied
Her hat and let the damp hair fall,
And, last, she sat down by my side
And called me. When no voice replied,
She put my arm about her waist,
And made her smooth white shoulder bare,
And all her yellow hair displaced,
And, stooping, made my cheek lie there,
And spread, o'er all, her yellow hair,
Murmuring how she loved me – she
Too weak, for all her heart's endeavor,
To set its struggling passion free
From pride, and vainer ties dissever,
And give herself to me forever.
But passion sometimes would prevail,
Nor could tonight's gay feast restrain
A sudden thought of one so pale
For love of her, and all in vain:
So, she was come through wind and rain.
Be sure I looked up at her eyes
Happy and proud; at last I knew
Porphyria worshiped me: surprise
Made my heart swell, and still it grew
While I debated what to do.
That moment she was mine, mine, fair,
Perfectly pure and good: I found
A thing to do, and all her hair
In one long yellow string I wound
Three times her little throat around,
And strangled her. No pain felt she;
I am quite sure she felt no pain.
As a shut bud that holds a bee,
I warily oped her lids: again
Laughed the blue eyes without a stain.
And I untightened next the tress
About her neck; her cheek once more
Blushed bright beneath my burning kiss:
I propped her head up as before,
Only, this time my shoulder bore
Her head, which droops upon it still:
The smiling rosy little head,
So glad it has its utmost will,
That all it scorned at once is fled,
And I, its love, am gained instead!
Porphyria's love: she guessed not how
Her darling one wish would be heard.
And thus we sit together now,
And all night long we have not stirred,
And yet God has not said a word!




    PETA = Hypocrites, and also, "Don't Toss That Rabbit"

    Peta vs Animals
    Via: http://onlineschools.org/

    PETA sucks.  This infoposter from Online Schools, though slanted, is remarkably accurate on the subject of PETA's hypocrisy.

    For the record, I have no problem with shelters killing animals that are unadoptable-- it's what I wish they'd do with most individuals of the pitbull type of dog instead of trying to rehabilitate those with "problems". I'm not even sure that human beings on the extreme end of the spectrum of "aggressive and violent" can be rehabilitated, and I'm morally certain that dogs cannot (meaning I would not accept the risk of exposing anyone to a 'rehabilitated' mean dog).

    The problem that I have with shelters is exemplified by their method of disposing of, for instance, rabbits; in the last resort they euthanise them and that protein goes... nowhere useful. There are plenty of hungry humans, even setting aside those I'd rather not see fed, who'd benefit from rabbit stew. Given that I wouldn't care if starving humans ate my dead body (though I'd rather not be murdered for my meat), I don't think that putting a healthy but absolutely surplus rabbit in the pot does any harm. If it was a pet for years, there are implicit human responsibilities and concerns that should have been addressed-- but by the original keeper of the rabbit.

    Now, the third item and pressing question is, why not make puppy tacos? (Let's not consider eating cat. I wouldn't, and in that I include trapped bobcat, while having no absolute objection to trapping bobcats when they are not endangered. It just so happens, they're all endangered (mostly by loss of habitat).)  I see no reason not to, though I see many good reasons to avoid a situation (that is, birth of more puppies than anyone needs or can care for) where it becomes necessary. Ideally there would be no unadoptable puppies, but that's far from probable any time soon.

    And the only reason I might not support (which doesn't mean "try to stamp out") raising dogs for meat is the conversion factor: they take an omnivorous, and in fact heavily carnivorous diet suitable to the canine niche in the food web. Eating dog meat could be called a habit of too much, or too little: too much money, too many running-loose dogs to get rid of; or, too little money, too little control of canine reproduction.

    And finally, NB: "whale boat attackers" are for the most part just enforcing international law on the high seas, without a badge but with every moral right and my approbation to do so.

    Rabbit Meat

    Rabbit meat
    Butchery, yes! Disposal? NO!
    Image via Wikipedia